"Warp" <war### [at] tagpovrayorg> wrote in message news:406c4225@news.povray.org...
> Tom Melly <tom### [at] tomandlucouk> wrote:
> > Ah - reading between the lines here, I take it that no pure source still
exists
> > for beta 2? That seems, well, odd, but at least explains things.
>
>   What do you mean "pure source"?

I mean the source (all req. files) that was compiled to beta 2. You seem to
imply that re-compiling beta 2 (with a new expiry date) is not possible, since
the source files required for that no longer exist in the same state. Or have I
misunderstood?

Post a reply to this message